UPL Ltd (NSE: UPL) Q3 2025 Earnings Call dated Jan. 31, 2025
Corporate Participants:
Anurag Gupta — Head of Investor Relations
Anand Vora — Chief Financial Officer
Mike Frank — Chief Executive Officer, Global Crop Protection Business
Bhupen Dubey — Chief Executive Officer, Advanta Seeds
Raj Tiwari — Chief Executive Officer, Speciality Chemicals and Whole Time Director
Analysts:
Abhiram Iyer — Analyst
Siddharth Gadekar — Analyst
Somaiah — Analyst
Ankur Periwal — Analyst
Himanshu Porwal — Analyst
S. Ramesh — Analyst
Steve Byrne — Analyst
Abhijit Akella — Analyst
Bhavya Gandhi — Analyst
Love Sharma — Analyst
Rohit Nagraj — Analyst
Nitin Agarwal — Analyst
Krishan Parwani — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to the UPL Limited Q3 FY 2025 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, all participant lines will remain in the listen-only mode and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal the operator by pressing star then zero on your touchstone telephone. Please note that this conference is being recorded.
I now hand the conference over to Mr Anurag Gupta, Head of Investor Relations. Please go-ahead, sir.
Anurag Gupta — Head of Investor Relations
Thank you, Ryan. Good day, everyone. Thanks for joining us today for the results for the 3rd-quarter and nine months ending 31st December 2024. The presentation, press release and the financial statements have been made available on the website, and we take it that you have read the safe-harbor statement. From the management team, we have with us today Vice-Chairman, Rajand; CEO of our Global Crop Protection business, Mike Frank; CFO, Anand Vora; CEO of our India Crop Protection platform, Ashish Dhobal; CFO of our seeds business, Advanta Sujay Sarkar; CEO of our seeds business, Advanta Bhupend Dube; CEO of our Specialty Chemicals business or, Raj Tiwari; Hillu, Chief Commercial Officer and other members of the leadership team. We will start with Anand and Mike presenting the performance for the quarter, followed by the Q&A.
With that, I now hand it over to Anand. Anand, over to you.
Anand Vora — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Anura. A very warm welcome to all of you who have joined us today. The global crop protection market continues to see recovery with the demand coming from across key regions. Channel destocking is largely over in major markets and we consider this financial year FY ’25 as a year of recovery. The business performance for 3rd-quarter shows a good bounce-back and provides us confidence in maintaining our guidance on revenue, EBITDA and operating cash flows. For the full-year. This is also corroborated by the year-to-date robust performance, which has sequentially improved over the past 3/4. Before we dive deeper into the financial performance, I would like to share updates on our two recent corporate actions.
The first one is our rights issue, which was a success with issue being oversubscribed two times. The allotment of US dollar INR100 million or INR844 crores, representing 25% of the rights issue price was received in December 2024. Additionally, the rights issue committee met on 24th January and approved the first-call on the partly paid equity shares for another INR844 crores. The record date for which was fixed for 30th January 2025, we expect to receive the first-call money by end of March 2025.
The next update is on Advanta Enterprises Limited. We have signed a definitive agreement with AlphaWave Global under which they will invest US dollar $350 million, US dollar $100 million as primary investments in the company and US dollar $250 million as secondary through purchase of shares for — from UPL Limited for an approximate 12.44% stake in the company. This marks a second investment in the enterprise by a global investor in a span of two years. As an update, we are awaiting clearance from the Competitive Commission of India or the CCI for a final go-ahead. We expect to receive the CCI approval by end of February or mid-March.
Now let me take you through some of the key financial highlights for the 3rd-quarter. Revenues stood at INR10,907 crores in Q3, a strong 10% growth versus last year. This was led by 9% growth in volumes, a 5% in pricing, offset by a 4% decline due to ForEx. The contribution for the 3rd-quarter stood at INR1 — with INR4,476 crores, a strong 66% growth on a year-on-year basis. The contribution margin stood at 41%, which is nearly 1,400 basis-point jump over that of the previous year. This significant growth was driven by better product mix, especially with the differentiated and sustainable segment, overall COGS improvement and normalization of rebates. SG&A spend was INR2,313 crores compared to INR2,272 crores last year. The EBITDA for Q3 stood at INR2,163 crores, a 4x increase or that of the previous year.
The EBITDA margins were 19.8%, an increase of around 1,600 basis-points from 4.2% in the last year’s same quarter. Profit-after-tax adjusted for exceptional items, associate income and minority interest showed a healthy INR828 crores as compared to a loss of INR1,217 crores in the previous year. Let me share some of the key components leading to the net profit of INR828 crores. We had a healthy EBITDA of INR2,163 crores against INR416 crores in the same-period of the previous year. Depreciation and amortization at INR689 crore was marginally higher than that of the previous year. Finance costs at INR704 crores was marginally lower due to a drop-in working capital and result in reduction in borrowings.
The FX or foreign-exchange losses stood at INR108 crore, a sharp reduction from INR613 crore in Q3 of the previous year with which as you as you must be aware, included the Argentina devaluation. Income tax during the current-period under review, the — the company has received a CIT appeal order for assessment year 2016 ’17, providing a favorable judgment. Consequent to this judgment, the company has reversed the provision amounting to INR592 crores, which was created over — over the — which was created in the previous years due to uncertainty over the allowability of some of the eligible expenditure. So for this quarter, we are seeing a tax credit of INR499 crores against previous year tax credit of INR59 crores. On associated — associate companies and joint-ventures, we have a charge of INR278 crores largely on account of losses from and Origer, the two Brazilian associate companies.
Moving over to the key financial highlights for the nine months, revenue for nine months stood at INR31,064 crores, up by 7% year-on-year. Volumes were up by 14%, whereas we saw a price reduction by 5% and an exchange impact of 2%. The contribution was — stood at INR12,239 crore, was up year-on-year by 13%, largely due to product mix, COGS improvement and revaluation normalization in the 3rd-quarter. SG&A at INR7,356 crore were up by 1%. The EBITDA for nine months stood at INR4,884 crores, a strong 36% growth versus last year, driven largely by higher contribution and productivity enhancement initiatives. EBITDA margins at 15.7% were up by 340 basis-points over the previous year, which was — which was at 12.3%.
Based on the year-to-date performance and Q4 forecast, we are confident of delivering the stated guidance of 50% growth in EBITDA this year. Profit-after-tax year-to-date was breakeven, a significant improvement versus September 2024 and driven by the strong EBITDA in Q3 and the tax reversal as mentioned earlier. Moving on to working capital, net-debt and free-cash flows as on end of December 2024. I’m pleased to share that our working capital in December stood at INR13,280 crores, INR6,000 crores lower versus that of the previous year. This positive development was achieved through continuous focus on inventory management and tight credit control and improved collections.
In number of days, net working capital stood at 107 days, lower from 155 days in the previous year, a reduction of 48 days. Inventory stood at 109 days, a reduction of 31 days, while payables at 111 days were lower by seven days versus that of the previous year. The receivables at 109 days, lower by 24 days versus the previous year. We also saw a reduction in non-recourse factoring by INR1,726 crores on a year-on-year basis, equivalent to 14 days lower than that of the previous year.
As regards our debt situation, our gross debt reduced by US dollar 815 million year-on-year, that is INR5,930 crores. And as of December ’24, the gross debt stood at US dollar 3.53 billion. In INR terms, INR30,244 crores. On-net debt, I would like to highlight that we reduced US dollar 745 million versus the same-period last year and also by US dollar $264 million versus September — the quarter-ending 30th September 2024. This is for the first time in recent period where our December net-debt was lower than that of the previous quarter. This was mainly due to significant improvements in our working capital management.
Overall, in the first-nine months, our net-debt was higher by $363 million, which is significantly lower than the US dollar $1.7 billion increase in net-debt during the same-period in the previous year. Cash and bank balance as of 31st December was $511 million, about INR4,374 crores as compared to US dollar 580 million in the previous year. It is to be noted that the net-debt amounts and the cash balance includes US $100 million that’s INR844 crores we have received towards the rights issue, which as you know, the allotment was completed before December 2024. With this continued focus on working capital improvement, we are on-track to achieve our target of INR300 million to $400 million of operating free-cash flow.
With this, I hand over to Mike to take us through to UPL Corporation global — UPL’s Global Crop Protection business and where Mike will provide more details. Over to you, Mike.
Mike Frank — Chief Executive Officer, Global Crop Protection Business
Thank you, Anand. Hello, everyone, and welcome to our 3rd-quarter FY ’25 earnings call. It’s great to connect again with all of you. Before we review the quarter, I’d like to share my thoughts on the crop protection market. The global crop protection market continues to rebound as farmer and dealer buying patterns are now reset. Channel destocking is largely complete in most major markets and we continue to see normalized ordering patterns with good demand and a healthy balance between channel stocking and farm gate usage. With active ingredient prices now stable at the current levels, our considerable focus on process efficiencies have significantly contributed to improving product and EBITDA margins.
Additionally, we continue to remain focused on profitably increasing our market-share as evident from our industry-leading volume growth. This continues to demonstrate the effectiveness of our customer engagement model and the value in our offerings. I’m pleased to highlight that our focus on operational excellence has positively impacted working capital, specifically through inventory optimization, tighter credit controls and reducing receivable terms. The year-to-date success that we have had with working capital improvement will help us drive towards achieving our full-year free-cash flow guidance.
Let’s now turn to the quarterly performance. Our 3rd-quarter results show a strong bounce-back and give us confidence to maintain our FY ’25 guidance on revenue, EBITDA and free-cash flow for the full-year at the Group level. This is also supported by our strong nine-month performance, which has sequentially improved over each of the past 3/4. I’m pleased to share that our 3rd-quarter revenue was up by 15% versus last year. Growth was led by continued higher volumes across key regions such as Latin-America and Europe. Among major segments, fungicides continued with a robust performance. In Brazil, Manco volume was the prime driver and in Europe, was a contributor to our growth. Our insecticides portfolio in the 3rd-quarter was driven by higher acephate volumes in Brazil, partially offsetting the pricing challenges in the first-half of the financial year.
Herbicide’s growth benefited from rebate normalization versus the previous year, mainly in North-America. However, we also had volume growth in this segment across a few regions, led by strong in-season demand for our products. Revenue growth in our NPP business was driven by a mix of improved pricing as well as higher volumes led by biostimulants in both Europe and Brazil. And additionally, growth was supported by biocontrol volumes in Europe. Our contribution margin for the 3rd-quarter has shown a remarkable turnaround and demonstrates our ability to earn margins in the current environment.
Overall, margin improvement has been led by improved product mix, mainly in the differentiated and sustainable segment, COGS improvement, and lastly, normalization of revaluation primarily in North-America and Brazil. I’m pleased to highlight that with this strong performance, our year-to-date contribution margin has grown by 470 basis-points. Importantly, we grew our differentiated and sustainable volumes by 16% versus last year, led by three-way evolution in Brazil and acephate-based ferosi also in Brazil. We also witnessed a strong margin improvement in our NPP portfolio. We are encouraged by this trend and the continued strong adoption of our products by our customers.
Turning to SG&A, our focus on productivity enhancement initiatives has led to a reduction in overheads of around 5% in Indian rupee terms in the 3rd-quarter versus last year. Moving to our regional performance for the quarter. In Latin-America, our revenue grew by a robust 12%, led by higher volumes, but offset by exchange impact in Brazil. Brazil was led by as well as acephate-based solo and mixture products. Growth in Evolution and Ferosi also led to improvement in the overall differentiated volumes. In other parts of Latin-America, volume-led growth was partially impacted by continued pricing pressure. North-America continues to experience strong demand for our products with channel inventories and rebates normalized in the region. Among key AIs, herbicide chest such as had good volume growth. Overall, the region grew by a strong 67% versus last year.
Europe’s revenues were up by 23%, driven by strong volumes in fungicides such as, which is a premium product offering for preventative and curative disease control in potato crops. Additionally, our NPP products had a strong growth versus last year in Europe, driven by volumes while also delivering margin expansion. The rest of the world was down by 4%, primarily from pricing pressure. Regions such as Africa, Australia and China faced some headwinds in this regard.
Now turning to our outlook. Our outlook for Q4 and the full-year FY ’25. We expect headwinds related to softness in ag commodity prices to continue and prices of key AIs to remain stable and range-bound. In-spite of this, and as demonstrated in Q3, the tailwinds from our refreshed inventory, our strong focus on operational excellence and efficiency, all combined with robust grower demand for our products, we believe this will power our ability to compete aggressively and deliver on our EBITDA and cash-flow commitments in Q4 and for full-year. The team remains focused and disciplined on SG&A, and we are further evaluating efficiencies in our operating model.
Overall, we continue to focus on our energies on margins, which have started to improve from the 3rd-quarter. This is expected to continue in the 4th-quarter with second-half margins outperforming the first-half of the year, mainly due to the reasons I highlighted earlier. Our new product launches for this financial year remain on-track and we expect to deliver $85 million from these NPLs. Our attention on cash generations remains a priority and we are further optimizing our inventories and working and other working capital items as seen in our results.
So in summary, I see this quarter as a period of recovery with strong volume-led growth, lower headwinds in general for pricing and overall COGS improvement, resulting in superior EBITDA. The key highlight, however, remains the significant improvement in our working capital. I want to thank our team for their dedicated efforts and our valuable channel partners for our strong overall performance in this quarter, and I’m confident we will deliver on our financial commitments in the 4th-quarter.
I’ll now hand it back over to Anand, who will take you through the updates of our other platforms. Anand, over to you.
Anand Vora — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Mike. Now let me also provide a quick update on our other three platforms. That’s the UPL Sustainable Agri Solutions, the India Crop protection business, Advanta Seeds, our seeds platform and the newly formed specialty chemicals and manufacturing platform, Superform Chemistry Limited.
I’ll start with UPL SS. We saw a recovery in Q3 with revenues at INR535 crores, up by 44% year-on-year, driven primarily by higher volumes. This has been achieved through high liquidation of sell-in, conscious placement closer to the season and lower currif returns. Additionally, our growth was also supported by higher NPP volumes, that’s the natural plant protection products as well as selective post-emergent herbicides along with steady rubby placement, which continues to indicate good consumption of our offerings at the ground level. At contribution margin, we improved by 530 basis-points to 16.9% versus 11.5% in the previous year. This accretion was driven by new launches, better pricing and superior product mix.
Our platform SG&A was INR114 crores, nearly flat versus last year, driven by overall cost-efficiency. While our EBITDA is still in the red at negative INR24 crores for the quarter, it is significant improvement versus last year where it was — it stood at negative INR70 crores. On working capital side, normalized inventory levels and tighter credit control helped improving receivables and overall lower working capital requirement.
For the nine-month period, revenue stood at INR2,552 crores, 6% higher than last year, 500 basis-point higher contribution margin versus that of the previous year and EBITDA at INR348 crores is over 100% higher than that of the previous year. EBITDA margins at 13.7% were 650 basis-points higher than that of the previous year. We expect to sustain growth in the 4th-quarter with margins in-line with year-to-date figures and overall better cash-flow versus that of the last year.
Moving on to our seeds platform, Advanced. After a rather challenging H1, the seed — the seed platform saw a good improvement in the 3rd-quarter with a robust revenue growth of 11% versus that of the previous year. This was supported by a mix of higher volumes and better pricing along with favorable FX impact. The key growth drivers were grain in Argentina, sunflower in Argentina and Europe and corn in India.
Overall, despite a good growth in revenue, we maintained flat contribution with margins contracting by 615 basis-points, primarily due to favorable crop — unfavorable crop mix as well as lower recoveries due to higher input costs. EBITDA was down 15% versus last year at INR223 crores due to lower contribution margin and conscious strategic investment in R&D and marketing we have been making to support our growth. We continue to maintain focus on margin improvement and cash generation in this segment and are confident that this momentum is expected to yield favorable results in the 4th-quarter as well.
To sum-up, we have delivered a strong 3rd-quarter with a good improvement across all key indicators. Our revenue growth at 7% in nine months is on the higher side of our stated guidance. Further, our EBITDA growth in nine months has been 36% and we are on-track to deliver 50% growth in EBITDA over that of the previous year, considering our forecast for Q4. With our success so-far in reducing our gross and net-debt versus last year, we are confident of achieving the operating cash — free-cash flow guidance of US dollar 300 million to US dollar 400 million. Further with the rights issue amount of — of US dollar to $200 million or roughly about INR1,600 crores of the — and the Advanta seat proceeds of US dollar 350 million expected within this year, we expect the net-debt to EBITDA ratio to be around two for the full financial year.
With this, I hand over back to the moderator and we are ready to take questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touchstone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and 2. Participants are requested to use their handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles.
The first question comes from the line of Abhiram Ayera from Deutsche Bank. Please go-ahead.
Abhiram Iyer
Hi, congratulations the company on a strong set of numbers. I had two questions. One was, could you let us know what your incremental cost of debt is at the moment? And the second question is, pertaining to your upcoming perpetuals, has the company taken any plan of action to address these?
Anand Vora
So our cost of debt is roughly around 7% on — that’s average across all the debt instruments. We have bonds and we have bank loans. On the perpetual, we keep a close watch and we will be taking, as you know, most of our cash flows come in Q4, the operating cash flows. We have raised the rights money and we are also expecting cash inflow on the Advanta monetization. So we will be taking a decision closer through the — I would say in next couple of months, we should be taking that decision.
Abhiram Iyer
Got it. Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Siddharth from Equirus. Please go-ahead.
Siddharth Gadekar
Hi, sir. Congrats on a very strong performance. Sir, I have three questions. First is on the rest of the world revenues. The rest of the world revenues have declined by 22%. But can you just give a breakdown of what has driven this growth investment bond?
Anand Vora
Mike, would you take that?
Mike Frank
Sure. So on the rest of the world? from a crop protection standpoint, our revenues were down, not by that magnitude. I would say, obviously, the rest of the world is a very large region for us. We did see some softness in the business in China as well as Australia in the 3rd-quarter. And in a few African countries, as we’re — as we wait for some tender business to materialize, we also had seen that get pushed from Q3, our Q3 and now we’re expecting them in Q4. So yes, so for the rest of the world from a global crop protection standpoint, the business was down a little bit based on those issues and I would say continued pricing headwinds for some of our products. Maybe it would be good to hear from Bu Pen on the on the seed business as well.
Bhupen Dubey
Thank you so let me take this further. Basically, you saw that most of the currencies got impacted and as the dollar strengthened immediately after the nomination of Trump. And we did see some impact largely coming in currency, especially, as you know, we report in INR. So that is one of the major reasons also for the sharp decline. As Mike rightly alluded, in dollar terms, we did not see as much drop, but in INR terms, we saw a significant drop.
Siddharth Gadekar
Okay. The second question is on the cost side, like we have just highlighted that over the last 12, 18 months, we have improved a lot of our processes. So can you just quantify like what is the quantum of improvement on the cost side because of our processes efficiencies and reduction in SG&A?
Anand Vora
Raj, would you take that? The cost efficiencies and is and other things on the production manufacturing side.
Raj Tiwari
Well, I mean that’s a — that’s a continuous exercise on the — on the on the manufacturing side we have substantially done work-in terms of reducing the cost one — of course because of raw materials or but also because of the variable-cost optimization. We have also optimized our fixed-cost in the factory, both in terms of headcount as well in terms of you know you know power which is utilities right but on you can cop mic you have some more colors to give?
Mike Frank
Well, yeah, the other part of the question was just on SG&A efficiencies. And so this has been an area across the enterprise where we’ve been are I think, really diligent in looking at our target operating model and finding ways to become more efficient. A lot of those efforts are now complete and our current run-rate should be in effect going-forward. That being said, we’re always looking for additional ways to drive efficiency, whether it’s from AI tools or other things. And so we — our view is we’re never finished from an SG&A standpoint. We’re always looking for more ways to become more efficient, but we’re quite pleased with the progress that we’ve made over the last 18 months and giving us a new level of cost that really allows us to compete in the marketplace.
Siddharth Gadekar
The last question for Anand. Given the kind of debt reduction that we have seen in this quarter, are we still sticking to the same $300 million, $400 million free-cash flow or there could be some upside to that?
Anand Vora
No, I think we are — we saw a good reduction in the working capital and you know, we still have some ability, as I mentioned earlier, that even our non-recourse is at a lower than last year and we had guided for $1 billion of non-recourse securitization. So that should give us an ability to raise further free-cash flow. But at this stage, we are sticking to the EUR300 million. Whatever upside comes, of course, we’ll be using that to repay the debt-only.
Siddharth Gadekar
Okay. Thank you so much.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of from Avendus Spark. Please go-ahead. If you can please unmute from your rent and ask your question.
Somaiah
Yeah, sure. Thanks for the opportunity, sir. Thank you. So first question is on the pricing part. After six to seven quarters, we are seeing a positive growth on the pricing front. So you can give some color on that. So this is a — I mean you have been saying prices have been kind of stabilizing. So we have now been able to take price hikes. So the trajectory has moved from more of stabilization to now a kind of a growth mode? And how do you see it going-forward next couple of quarters?
Anand Vora
Mike, would you take that?
Mike Frank
Yeah. Sure. So look from an overall pricing standpoint, we did see a positive progress in Q3. That was largely based on comparing last year’s Q3 where we had abnormal rebates and some high-cost inventory returns. So I would say if you look at our overall price performance in the quarter on a product-by-product basis, you know, we’re basically seeing now relatively flat pricing. So we’re getting some price lift based on mix. And so as we drive more of our sales to our differentiated and sustainable product portfolio. That’s giving us a mixed lift in price. But generally speaking across the portfolio, prices have largely stabilized and we’re not in a — in a cycle yet where we’re seeing prices tick-up?
Somaiah
Got it, sir. But also on the — between the different regions, if you can just give a color on is the channel inventory though getting over, is it same across regions versus status or is there a differentiation between, say, US, US and LatAm? And also in terms of pricing climate between both these regions, is it similar or is there any need to take?
Mike Frank
Yeah. So from an inventory standpoint, as we talked about in the prepared remarks, we believe that for the most part, in most regions, the destocking has been complete. And there’s good balance between, you know what dealers and distributors are buying and what they’re selling then to the farmers. And so there’s always going to be some exceptions to the rule-based on price or timing of when a season takes place. But generally speaking, we now believe we’re in a balanced supply to the channel and the channel sales to the growers. And so the destocking is largely complete.
I would say from a pricing standpoint, you know, again, in the post patent segment, those prices have been reset. They really started to reset over 12 months ago. Again, we’re seeing relatively stable pricing now across the post-patent business. And in the differentiated and sustainable portfolio, which is our high-value segment. Again, we’re seeing very strong volume growth. We’re seeing good demand for those products. We’re seeing our margins continue to grow in that segment. But that’s more a result of cost of goods improvement and efficiency efforts, whereas again prices are relatively stable and in that segment as well.
Somaiah
Got it, sir. Just one last question from my side. On answer, on capex outlook, how we are thinking about?
Anand Vora
No, I think we have put some constraints this year. We — as of date, we have spent about INR1,200 crores of capex, which includes the acquisition of — it is a small acquisition, as you know from, the brand. But so against a budget of INR1,800 crores, which we had set at the beginning of the year, we hope to be below that about INR1,500 crore to INR1,600 crores. So there would be some cash-flow protected out-of-the capex spend what we had budgeted for. I guess for the next year’s guidance, we’ll review how based on what happens by the end of this year and then we’ll take a call on the next year.
Somaiah
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Ankur Periwal from Axis Capital. Please go-ahead.
Ankur Periwal
Yeah, hi, sir. Congratulations on a good set of numbers and thanks for the opportunity. First question on the overall competitive intensity, especially in Latin-America, let’s say Brazil. We have shown a YTD growth here. But if you can past comment in terms of the pricing competition there and the pricing uptick that we have seen, which geography would have contributed to this 5% year-on-year growth that we saw in this quarter.
Mike Frank
Yeah. Thank you, Ankur, for the question. Again, the pricing uptick in this quarter is really a result of the normalization of the rebates and the elimination of high-cost inventory, which was really liquidated to a large degree last year at the same time. So from a product-by-product basis, our prices are relatively stable in the market. But of course, with fresh inventory and now that we’re running with lower inventory levels, that is also helping improve our margins. Now from a competitive intensity standpoint, I would say every market has a high degree of competitive intensity. I don’t think that Latin-America or Brazil is unique in that way. In every market.
As you can see from our volume performance, we are growing volumes. I think we are growing volumes at a faster rate than the industry. And so we’re very much focused on profitably growing our market-share. We’ve been successful doing that based on really our customer engagement model. In Brazil, as you know, we have a number of models where we work with the co-ops very closely and large distributors and dealers. We also have Origio platform, which is — which is a partnership with Bunge where we go-direct to very large growers in the Mata Grosso area. That model is also proving to be successful. So our unique approach — approach in each market with a really strong focus on how do we engage with customers to create value for them and for farmers, that model is playing out and it’s helping us with our market-share growth.
Ankur Periwal
Thanks for that. And just a second bit, you know, there is a in the minority interest, that number from a negative has turned positive. And similarly, the associate share profit, there is a sharp jump there Q-on-Q as well as Y-on-Y. Just some thoughts there on how to look at both these line items going ahead and for FY ’26.
Anand Vora
So basically, on the associate, we report, at least for our two major associates in Brazil that is and Origio, we report with a quarter delay. So last year, of, of course, was first year and as you know, this year, the season also started a bit late. So last year we had a small profit, which is reflected in the numbers, whereas this year, due to delay in the season, we had losses both in and in Origio and which we hope to recover as the season comes as we report for December quarter next — in next quarter as well as for the full-year in the subsequent quarter, we expect to recover part of these losses which we have incurred. So largely these are because of our losses in our Brazilian associate.
Ankur Periwal
Yeah. Sure, Ronant. And just on the minority as well.
Anand Vora
Thank you. Yeah. I mean on the minority interest, obviously, it’s a — we have to — whatever is the last — gains or losses, we have to keep the — there is a minority interest, as you know, in various of our platforms, we do have shareholders like in case of UPL came in, we have TPG we own which owns 22% and in case of our seed platform, it’s KKR and in case of India, you have Brookfield KKR and ADEA TPG with 9% holding. So, they would be sharing the losses as well as the gains.
Ankur Periwal
Sure. Thanks for that and all the best. Thank you.
Anand Vora
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Himanshu Purwa from Seaport Global. Please go-ahead.
Himanshu Porwal
Hi, good afternoon and congratulations on strong earnings. I had a couple of questions. So first is with regard to the perpetual. I think I might have missed the — when you were answering somebody’s question. If you can please provide a guidance on the likelihood of these being called in February? And secondly, if you can — if you can confirm and clarify the amount of rights issue proceeds that has already been completed because I see headlines of around like million being approved, but I guess not all of it has been conducted yet. So those are my two questions. Thank you.
Anand Vora
Sure. So let me take the second one first and that probably partly should answer the first question itself. On the rights issue, you’re right, we made a $400 million rights issue. And in Indian context, you’re allowed to call for — for part payment towards the proceeds of the rights issue. So on allotment, we called for 25% of the rights issue, so which is $100 million. Equivalent is INR844 crores. We have also — the committee has also called for the first-call of another 100 million as of 30th of Jan was the book closure date.
This decision was taken by the committee on 24th Jan and we expect to get the money in by March. In our business, it’s Q — Q — Q4 is when we see a large part of our cash-flow from the operations being coming through as we get our receivables money against our receivables as well as we sell — as for what we have sold-in LatAm as well as in US and Europe. So we are closely monitoring the situation and we expect to soon come up with the announcement as regards the perpetual whether we will go for repricing or we will call them back. So that’s as of now our position on perpetual.
Himanshu Porwal
Understood. That’s all-clear. Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of S. Ramesh from Nirmal Bank Equities. Please go-ahead.
S. Ramesh
Thank you very much and good evening. Congratulations on the good results. So if you were to look at your net-debt to EBITDA guidance of 2x, does it include the perpetual bonds on the debt side? And are you excluding the factoring? And what are the rating agencies considering to calculate the net-debt? Are they including the perpetual in their net-debt to EBITDA calculation?
Anand Vora
No. So, Ramesh, thanks for joining in. Perpetuals are part of net-worth, so they are not included in the debt. As regards the — your non-reco securitization, the rating agencies add them back as debt. As far as the banks are concerned, they don’t consider that as debt. So what we are telling you is what the bankers look at and which is the simple calculation of net-debt to EBITDA where non-recost securitization doesn’t form a part of the debt.
S. Ramesh
Okay. Now a question to Mike. In terms of the structure of the industry, if you look-ahead and consider that you will have to depend pretty much on volume growth, what is the sense of comfort you have in terms of capturing most of that on the top-line and maintaining working capital discipline to achieve a stable and improving ROCE, how do you see that for the industry and for UPL? Thank you.
Mike Frank
Yeah. Thanks, Ramesh. So look, I think as we as we look-forward over the next 12 plus months, you know, I think from an industry perspective, there’s going to continue to be a pressure on the price side. At this point in time, our base-case planning scenario is that we won’t see a change in the export price out of China. Obviously, that could change at some point. It’s not a sustainable scenario where there’s overcapacity and prices are basically being sold at or around the cost of goods. And so at some point, that will likely change. But in our base-case scenario, we’re not assuming that in our planning. And so I would say there’s a — if that plays out, I think from a pricing standpoint, there’s going to be a limitation to the ability to see much change in price.
Again, if you also overlay the fact that grower economics right now are stressed, I think the growers are really looking for every opportunity to look for how they can save money and really invest in high-quality, high-value products, which again I think that’s where we’re also winning from a market-share standpoint. To your second point regarding working capital, obviously, that’s been a large focus of us this year. And it’s really around our process improvements and using new tools, both AI and data and analytic tools to really hone in on-demand forecasting, lining up our production with a more just-in-time approach so that we are delivering products to our customers right when they need it. And so we’re going to continue with that discipline. So I believe the working capital benefits that we gained this year will continue as we go into the next season?
S. Ramesh
Okay. Thank you. Just one last thought. If you look at the gross contribution and the growth in EBITDA margin, how much of this is sustainable and to what extent will you be able to continue to get from the decline in input costs, how do you see that?
Mike Frank
Yeah. Again, from a base assumption standpoint, we have seen that we’re in a fairly stable environment right now where cost of goods as well as the export prices that we track out of China are running quite stable. Obviously, if there is an increase or decrease in input costs, we’re seeing some active ingredients get priced up a little bit or price down depending on which way the raw materials are going. And so that — again, that’s our planning scenario as we go-forward. Based on that and based on the good work that we’ve done across our plants from Raj and his team really looking at ways that we can debottleneck or increase yields.
We’re able to compete aggressively in the marketplace. And as you’ve seen in our margins in Q3, we really believe that this is the margin profile going-forward with the opportunity as we think about the next 12 and 24 months-to continue to drive our new product launches, which are primarily in the differentiated and sustainable segment, which we know have a higher overall margin profile. And so yes, that’s how we look at our margin profile going-forward.
S. Ramesh
Yeah. Thank you very much and wish you all the best. Thanks.
Mike Frank
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Steve Bernie from Bank of America. Please go-ahead.
Steve Byrne
Yes, thank you. Mike, your comments about the NPP and the — in the slide deck really captured my attention. I was curious to hear your view on what — what would you rank as the primary drivers of the increased demand for your NPP products? Is it the regulatory path and registration of these NPP products is it just more streamlined? Is that a key driver? Is it the — the distribution channel sees these products as an attractive bolt-on, they can — they can put them into their routine applications or is it at the grower level where these products like the biostimulants have a yield benefit? How would you — how would you rank those as driving the growth in these products?
Mike Frank
Yeah. Hi, Steve, good to hear from you. Firstly, it all starts with the grower. If the grower doesn’t see value in the products and technologies, then ultimately nothing else matters. And I think in our NPP business, you know, the strength of our portfolio, the capability of our sales organization and the investment that we’ve made in helping train our sales team, providing them the right tools that they can walk-in and talk to our dealers and our farmer customers about the value of biostimulants. That has really helped us drive that segment and we’ve seen that every quarter this year, and we believe we’re going to see it again in Q4.
Now secondly, the other part of our portfolio in NPP that’s growing our natural plant protection is our bio-control products. And so as you mentioned, the regulatory framework in many regions, not Europe, but many regions outside of Europe has a fast-track for biocontrol products to enter the marketplace. And so in those markets like Brazil, for example, we’re seeing really strong success of new technologies that we’ve introduced in the last couple of years, including a technology in a product called Namaxa, which is a three-way fungicide for control of nematodes. We’ve just got that same product registered in the US and so we’re now starting to commercialize that product in North-America. So it’s a bit of a combination, Steve, but it all goes back to the grower. We’ve got to prove to the grower that these products add value on — from an agronomic and economic standpoint. And as we do that, we’re seeing real success across our sustainable platform.
Steve Byrne
Thank you. Well, thank you for that, Mike. And one more for you, and that is in the US market, are you seeing any increased interest from either the wholesale or the retail distribution channel to be more interested in say private-label products or potentially more interested in something other than the primary branded products that they have contracts with? Is there increased interest in that? And is that an opportunity for you because you provide the certainty of supply that if they were to just go directly to you know actives, generic actives out of China, there may be less certainty on the supply, particularly with tariffs.
Mike Frank
Yeah. Good. That’s a good question, Steve. As you know, the distribution network in the US and North-America is very consolidated. There’s five or six large players. You know, each of them having some segment of their crop protection business in what you would call a private-label approach, whether that’s 10% of their sales or up to maybe 25% of the sales depending on the strategy of the distributor. We’ve always viewed that as an opportunity. I would say that segment is growing slightly. It’s not — it’s not transforming in terms of the percent of the market.
Again, I think each of the distributors looks at it a bit differently. And so where there’s opportunity, we are growing that part of our business. You know, again, I think it’s based on the quality of our products, the fact that we can compete aggressively on price. And lastly, maybe the uncertainty over tariffs from China, all of those things contribute, I think, to the ability for us to continue to grow that segment.
Now in addition to that though, we’re also very interested and continue to drive our branded sales in North-America. And we have a number of new products that we’ve launched in the past few years and many products in our pipeline that are coming forward. And so we’ll continue to have a mix in North-America of branded products that are going to create value for our customers and for us as well as compete in that more B2B market for that private-label business.
Steve Byrne
Great. Very helpful. Thank you.
Mike Frank
Thank you. Thank you, Steve.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Abhijit Akela from Kotak Securities. Please go-ahead.
Abhijit Akella
Yeah, good evening. Thank you so much for taking my questions. On the other comprehensive income, there is a negative item of about INR578 crores. Just to confirm whether that is related to the impact of rupee depreciation on the UST loan book that we have?
Anand Vora
A large part of it is that Abhijit.
Abhijit Akella
Got it. Got it. Thank you. And with regard to the scenario in Brazil, if I may, question for Mike maybe. The recent — the bankruptcies we’ve heard about of numerous distributors in Brazil. Is that having any significant impact on our business or on the industry? And if so, if you could please elaborate on that yeah.
Mike Frank
Thank you, Abhijit. So we did experience in the second-quarter some Chapter 11 bankruptcies that did have an impact on our business. One of one of our large distributors went into Chapter 11 in our second-quarter and we announced at that time a an ECL of approximately $8 million US dollars as a result of that chapter 11. You know, since then, it’s been quite, you know, I think Q3 for us, I don’t know that we’ve had any of our distributors filed Chapter 11. You know, the market is in Brazil right now, the soybeans are approaching the harvest season. There’s a good crop that’s coming. The fact that the local-currency has devalued against the US dollar actually helps the farmers a little bit when they go to commercialize their soybeans.
And so we’re expecting coming out of harvest, which is going to happen in the next 30 to 60 days in Brazil that there’s going to be fairly good liquidity at the grower level. And when growers have good liquidity, they’re going to pay their bills with dealers and distributors. And then that in-turn helps provide liquidity across the market. So you know, I think there is still some risks. What we see that banks are being more cautious in terms of their lending into the ag community. But generally, we’re expecting this to normalize. And again, I think at the heart of your question, we’re not seeing any additional bankruptcies that we experienced in Q3 or, of course, are expecting in Q4.
Abhijit Akella
Thank you very much, Mike. That’s really helpful. And just one last quick one for Anand, if I may. On the employee cost, please, there is a significant decline in employee cost quarter-on-quarter. So is this a good run-rate to model off of for subsequent quarters?
Anand Vora
Well, we have restructured some of our operations and that has you know, resulted in a reduction in the employee cost. And I would say it’s a — it’s a good benchmark, although if we do all well in Q4, we might see some of the bonus provisions coming through, in which case the cost can go up. So marginally. But otherwise, this should be a good benchmark.
Abhijit Akella
Yeah. Thank you and all the best. Thank you very much.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Bhavia Gandhi from Dalal and Stock Broking. Please go-ahead.
Bhavya Gandhi
Yeah. Hi, thanks for the opportunity. Sir, if you can just help me understand the cash-flow that we are going to generate out of Advanta debt repayment. Basically, I’m looking out for year-one, year two, year three debt — gross debt and net-debt, if you can help me understand that.
Anand Vora
I mean, let’s go step-by-step. This year, you know, we will have EUR200 million coming from rights issue, about EUR350 million coming from Advanta monetization, of which as I mentioned earlier, EUR100 million will be a primary issuance, which money will be used by Advanta for its capex or for its own growth initiatives. And EUR250 million is going to be secondary sales by UPL Limited, which will entirely go towards repayment of debt. So we are talking about EUR450 million rights plus Advanta monetization plus another EUR300 million free-cash flow coming from operations. So all these three, that is 450 plus, EUR750 million will go towards repayment of debt.
As you know, we have one scheduled repayment of loan, which is expected in September of 2025 of EUR250 million. We have the perpetuals which are up for repricing or repayment between February and May of this financial year, which we will decide later in February or so. We have in next financial year, 200 million additional coming from the rights issue plus the free-cash flow which would be generated during that financial year. And towards end of — in March 2025 — sorry, in April or May 2025, we have another 7 seven — another just another much? Yeah. We have close to about — in FY ’26, we have close to about $750 million payable and ’27 we have $900 million. So you know I would say immediately sometime in ’25, September 250 million is what is payable and against which, as I mentioned earlier this year itself, we should have close to $750 million of free-cash flow available.
Bhavya Gandhi
So roughly, can you sum it up — sum the number and provide the gross or net-debt levels for maybe next one or two years?
Anand Vora
Our intention is to you know, the way we look at it is we — we are first targeting to go net-debt to EBITDA to below 2 and we expect to remain between I would say next year between 1.5 to 2 or maybe go a bit lower than 1.5 and which means if you’re talking about $1 billion of EBITDA this year, then our net-debt should be at about INR2 billion next year. And the following year, with the EBITDA further growing, we are looking at debt of anywhere between, I would say 1.5 billion to $2 billion.
Bhavya Gandhi
Okay. And would it lead to any improvement in the average cost of borrowings, which is at 7%?
Anand Vora
No, that is a function of more — except for our bonds, most of our debt is linked to the SOFR rate. Now if the SOFR rate comes down, it would not only reduce our term-loan debt, which is linked to SOFR, but also our working capital cost. So both will come down because most of our borrowing except for our bonds are linked to the SOFR rate.
Bhavya Gandhi
So roughly, what would be that rate being?
Anand Vora
Well, we have a spread of anywhere between — at the moment, we have spreads of about 200 to, I would say, 225 basis-points anywhere between — let’s put it 175 to 225. That’s the spread which we have. So-far is at currently at about 4.5 or 4.6%. So now if SOFR comes down, then you would see the reduction in the spread. We expect the spreads to improve by about 35 to 50 basis-points. I would say sometime by mid of July, August because when we — when we got downgraded from investment-grade to BBB to double the rating we did see loans — the spreads on our existing loan go by 35 to 40 basis-points and we agreed to that on subject to if we come back to below net-debt to EBITDA of 2, then the same would be rolled back.
So based on our financial results of March 2025. We intend to go — we are quite hopeful of going below two and we intend to approach the banks to reduce it by that 35 to 40 bps increase which we have got given to them.
Bhavya Gandhi
Got it. Just one more thing, if I can squeeze in. If you can just mention the capex trajectory for maybe next two, three years.
Anand Vora
I mean, generally, we guide for one year where our capex is where in the range of about INR250 million to INR300 million, split I would say between almost equally between product registration and investments in new capacities. I think we would be maintaining those around that EUR250 million to $300 million, but you’ll get some more color of that at the Capital Market Day when we announce our annual results and we give guidance for the next financial year.
Bhavya Gandhi
Okay, fair enough. Thank you so much. That’s it from my end.
Anand Vora
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Lav Sharma from JPMorgan. Please go-ahead.
Love Sharma
Hi, thanks, Anand. I think more of a follow-up from the previous question. If you could just highlight, I think in some of the bank loans, you also had these covenants, which probably you had some relaxation available from — till FY 2025 or 2026, if you could just update what is the status there? And I think similar to the previous question, given the sizable maturity which we have from next year mainly the thought process would be to refinance, I believe at some point, if you could just indicate what is the — what is the ideal way for you to refinance that through bank markets or you think potentially through public bond markets as well? Thanks.
Anand Vora
Yeah, thanks,. So I’ll take the second question first. I mean, yes, we have some payments and we are closely watching. I mean, till the nomination of Mr Trump, we saw nicely the rates coming down. But now with the inflationary rhetorics, which we are hearing, rates have spiked back. We still talking to some of our bankers, we are expecting a at least 1% to 1.25% reduction during this calendar year. So we’ll be closely watching that. The good part is the spreads have come down considerably. So that’s positive.
And I think with our cash flows also improving, we are expecting some improvement some further improvement, which in other words means reduction in the spreads. So probably we will look at as you know, it depends on how the markets are, but we would look at either, you know a bond or a term-loan, whatever is most favorable and what gives us flexibility of repaying. So that’s what we would be considering. The first question was related to,
Love Sharma
I think on the bank loans, again, you had some other…
Anand Vora
Yeah, yeah, that’s right. Sorry, efficiency. Correct. So on the bank loan, what we had agreed for — when we agreed for a 35 to 40 bps increase, we said that for March ’24, net-debt to EBITDA of about 4.5 for March ’25 at 4 and for March ’26 at 3.5.
Love Sharma
Okay. Okay. But you just mentioned, so in case you achieve, let’s say, something like 2x for March ’25 itself, then that gives you a roll-back on 35 40 bps of prior — of repricing which you had.
Anand Vora
That is correct.
Love Sharma
Okay. Understood. Thank you. Very useful. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Rohit Nagraj from B&K Securities. Please go-ahead.
Rohit Nagraj
Yeah. Thanks for the opportunity and congrats on good set of numbers. Two questions. First thing that we’ve seen very serious tightening of working capital over the last few quarters. If the competitive intensity increases incrementally, is there any chance of it getting loosened or is it an irreversible process and this will be the normative working capital that we will be following incrementally. Thank you.
Mike Frank
Yeah, Rohid, I’ll maybe answer that from a global crop protection standpoint. So look, the working capital gains that we’ve made on a year-to-date basis have really come from both inventory management as well as shortening terms on our invoices, our DSOs. I think we’re at a level where both are sustainable and probably additional opportunity on DSOs. And so we’re going to continue to focus on that. Again, part of that is how do we match-up our deliveries to customers so that they get it right before the season. And so we can shorten that time from when it’s sitting in their warehouse to the time it moves to their customer. So that’s an opportunity for us to continue to align our production scheduling.
And then just generally, I think the challenge in the — in the industry and the margin pressure that the industry is seeing, I would expect to see some continued reduction in overall DSOs across the industry as everyone is trying to manage working capital, everyone’s dealing with interest cost. And so I would expect to see over the next one or two seasons some continued improvement at the industry level, which of course allows us to participate in that as well. So I think we’re at a sustainable level with some opportunity to continue to improve.
Rohit Nagraj
Got it. And second question is on the margins front. Given that I assume most of the efficiencies are already embedded in current margins, there is a little scope for further improvement. Obviously, it’s a continuous process nonetheless. But in terms of incremental scope to expand the margins, it’s relatively limited. Is that assessment correct? Thank you.
Mike Frank
I would say with our current portfolio and the cost assumptions we have and the pricing assumptions, that’s generally correct. However, our innovation pipeline is very strong. As we talked about, we have approximately $85 million of new product launches this year. Those products are going to scale-up again over the next three to five years. We’ve got more new products coming next year and the year-after that. So — and our new product launches are heavily skewed to our differentiated and sustainable portfolio, which has a significantly higher-margin profile. So I would expect that the growth that we see in our business going-forward, especially from these new products, they’re going to come at a higher-margin, which is going to have a positive impact across our — across our margin profile.
Rohit Nagraj
Thank you. Fair enough. That’s helpful. Thanks a lot and all the best.
Operator
Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, due to time constraint, we take the last question from the line of Nitin Agarwal from DAM Capital. Please go-ahead.
Nitin Agarwal
Hi, thanks for taking my question. Mike, on the contribution margin for the point that you mentioned about the contribution margins. So with the mix that you — that you have in mind, which is going to — which can change with the higher contribution products coming through. I mean, to what is the extent of gross contribution margin expansion that we can see in the best of the cases as we go-forward? Or it’s like 100, 200 basis-points or it’s a minimal sort of contribution increase or margin increase over where we are — where did you finish the year at?
Mike Frank
Yeah. Yeah. So net look, I would say in any given quarter, the mix profile is going to have some impact. And as we look at our Q4 that we’re participating right now, we actually have a strong mix of our differentiated sustainable portfolio. So from a Q4 standpoint, we would expect margins to continue to be strong as they were in Q3. And then I would say, as Anand answered earlier, on May 13 at our Capital Markets Day, we’ll provide more color on how we see the business evolving in FY ’26 and beyond. And so that is part of our working process right now. As I mentioned earlier, we know we’ve got a strong pipeline of new innovative products that are heavily skewed to the differentiated sustainable portfolio. And so I would expect as we as we get ready for our Capital Markets Day, we’ll have more shape and color on that. And overall, there’ll be margin accretion, I would expect as we think about the future.
Nitin Agarwal
Thank you so much.
Mike Frank
Thank you,..
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we have one participant, which is from the line of Krishn Parwani from JM Financial. Please go-ahead.
Krishan Parwani
Yeah, hi, sir. Congrats on the set of numbers. Just a two clarifications. First, Mike, I think you mentioned that destocking is near complete. So how do you see CY ’25 or FY ’26 panning out in terms of overall volume growth? Would it be like high-single-digit or how do you see it?
Mike Frank
Yeah. So assuming we’re right on the restocking being largely complete. I think from a volume standpoint in the next 12 months or Call-IT FY ’26 in our business, I think at the industry level, it’s going to be a mid to low single-digit volume growth. Again, our objective and what we’re seeing this year with our market-share gains, I think that momentum will continue to propel us. But at an industry level, I think it’s going to be a little bit less than the number you suggested.
Krishan Parwani
Okay. Got it. And secondly, the interest cost coming down to INR730 crores this quarter, I can see that includes INR98 crores of profit arising from hedging. So is the rest of the benefit on account of debt reduction or your interest cost has also gone down.
Anand Vora
I mean, Krishan, you would appreciate that I mean with the price table coming down overall, you know the hedging cost obviously, which is the differential of the interest rates between different countries, those would come — come down as we see the drop-in top-line out for the full-year. So that’s one. But also, with the interest rates, we saw them at least for the first-nine months, there was a reduction in the interest rates we saw and which in-turn would resulted in reduced as what you call the forward margins, forward — forward hedging costs. So that helped us to bring down the costs. This is essentially a function of what is the interest-rate differentials between the two geographies. And we try to remain, as we have always said, fully hedged, but we also see for opportunities if there are like, for instance in Brazil, if we sell against to customers, which are — there are customers who buy, although it’s sold-in real, but it’s linked to the dollar of the day, then we have a natural hedge available there.
So besides some of the countries we have really reduced — I mean, currencies have stabilized. You saw Argentina, I think the hedging costs have come down significantly lower. Similarly, we have seen some reduction in Turkey. In Russia, we don’t sell much, but whatever we sell, we try to sell it against the rupee denomination. So these are some of the initiatives which we have taken and which has helped us to bring down the hedging costs.
Krishan Parwani
Great, great. Thank you so much, Anand and Mike for answering my questions. Wish you all the best for the coming quarter. Thank you.
Anand Vora
Thank you, Krishnan.
Operator
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question-and-answer session. I now hand the conference over to Mr Anand Bora for his closing comments.
Anand Vora
Thank you very much for joining us on this call. If you have any follow-up question, feel free-to reach-out to Anurag, Gupta or myself, and we’ll be happy to answer them. Thanks once again for joining us on the call.
Operator
Thank you. On behalf of UPL Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines.