Navin Fluorine International Limited (NSE: NAVINFLUOR) Q4 FY23 earnings concall dated May. 13, 2023
Corporate Participants:
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Bhavya Shah — Orient Capital — Analyst
Sudarshan Padmanabhan — JM Financial Services Ltd. — Analyst
Abhijit Akella — Kotak Securities — Analyst
Archit Joshi — Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. — Analyst
Vivek Rajamani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Rohit Nagraj — Centrum Broking — Analyst
Krishan Parwani — JM Financial — Analyst
Bhaskar Chakraborty — Jefferies — Analyst
Keyur Pandya — ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited — Analyst
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to the Navin Fluorine International limited Q4 FY ’23 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode. And there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded.
I now hand the conference over to Mr. Bhavya Shah from Orient Capital. Thank you and over to you, sir.
Bhavya Shah — Orient Capital — Analyst
Thank you and welcome to the Q4 and FY ’23 earnings conference call. Today on this call we have Mr. Radhesh Welling, Managing Director and Mr. Anish Ganatra, Chief Financial Officer of Navin Fluorine International limited.
This conference call may contain forward-looking statements about the company which are based on beliefs, opinions, and expectations as of today. Actual results may differ materially. The statements are not the guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to credit. A detailed Safe Harbor statement is given on page number 2 of investor presentation of company, which has been uploaded on the stock exchange and company’s website as well.
With this, I now hand over the call to Mr. Radhesh Welling for his opening remarks. Over to you, sir.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Hello. Thank you very much. Good evening and a warm welcome to all the participants. I wanted to take a moment to acknowledge the inconvenience of calling you all on a Saturday evening for earnings call as I had to travel for some business from tomorrow onwards. We understand that this may disrupt your weekend plans and we sincerely appreciate your flexibility and consideration in joining us on short notice. Thank you for your continued support and commitment to Navin Fluorine.
On this call today. I’m joined by Mr. Anish Ganatra, Chief Financial Officer and our Investor Relation partner, Orient capital. I hope all of you got an opportunity to go through our financial results and investor presentation, which have been uploaded on the stock exchanges as well as on the company’s website.
Let me now start with key highlights for the quarter and year ending FY ’23 followed by business segment-wise updates. And then we’ll take you through the financial highlights for the period under review. I’m pleased to announce that our performance in FY ’23 has achieved several new milestones. For full year FY ’23, we achieved a key milestone of revenue from the operations exiting INR2,000 crore. Operating EBITDA crossed INR550 crores and operating PBT crossed INR460 crores. For Q4 FY ’23, we have reported quarterly revenue of INR697 crore. Operating EBITDA has more than doubled at INR202 crore on Y-on-Y basis. EBITDA margin stood at 28.9%, an expansion 586 basis point.
Commercial production at three of our new plants, HPP, MPP and agro intermediate plant has commenced successfully in the last fiscal. We have began commercial production of two new molecules at our MPP plant in Q4 FY ’23. And expect to launch at least one new molecule in FY ’24. R32 capex of INR80 crore in Surat will be commissioned as per schedule and the same should start from Q2 FY ’24. This demonstrates the strength of our business model and execution capabilities developed over the years. We improved our performance in uncertain times, captured growth opportunities, executed multiple projects successfully and accelerated our journey towards becoming the company we want to become in the future.
Now, some refresh and some additional updates. In line with our growth plan in March 2023, Navin Fluorine Advanced Science Limited, our wholly-owned subsidiary announced capital expenditure of INR450 crore for setting up a new 40,000 metric tons per annum hydrochloric acid plant at Dahej. The new capacity is expected to come on-stream in two years. The CapEx, is starting to progress well and is expected to be commissioned on schedule. With this capacity, we will be prepared to address rising demand in the pharmaceutical and agrochemical sectors as well as in the emerging areas like EV battery chemicals, solar, etc.
Apart from the ongoing expansions, which are scheduled to be completed by FY ’25, we are in the process of finalizing business plan for two projects to be presented to the Board for approval in calendar year 2023. These two projects are CDMO cGMP 4 and another project we’ve been working on in the specialty sector, in the specialty business unit. We have taken our annual plant shutdown for HFO in Dahej along with annual plant shutdown of one of the HF plants in Surat in the month of April.
We are pleased to announce — we are pleased to inform you the Board of Directors have recommended a final dividend of INR7 per equity share of face value of INR2 each subject to approval of shareholders. With this, the total dividend for the last year will be INR12 for the face value of INR2 each. I would now like to discuss the operating performance of each business units.
I’m happy to report that all our business units; specialty, HPP and CDMO delivered highest-ever quarterly revenues and profitability. Specialty business continues to deliver strong performance, driven by strong partnerships and new technology platforms. We reported revenue growth of 28% on Y-on-Y basis at INR204 crores — INR204 crores for Q4 FY ’23. In the fourth quarter of FY ’23, introduction of new products has made impact on our performance. These innovative offerings have resonated positively with customers contributing to our overall growth.
Agrochemical intermediate plant achieved optimal capacity utilization in the last quarter. Our HPP business generated revenue of INR289 crores, growth of 92% in Q4 FY ’23 as compared to the same period last year. The recent increase in sales can be attributed primarily on account of increased volume from NFASL, our subsidiary. We are pleased to report that our plant is currently operating at optimal capacity resulting in desired yields. Furthermore, we are excited to announce that the commissioning of R32 project in Surat is progressing as scheduled and we anticipate commencing production from beginning of Q2 FY ’24. We remain committed to driving profitability, enhancing operational excellence and seizing opportunities for further success.
Our CDMO business has reported highest-ever quarterly revenue of INR203 crores, reflecting Y-o-Y growth of 106% as compared to the same-period last year. Business is on strong footing and fine for further capacity expansion. Our revenue in Q4 FY ’23 has doubled, surpassing our stated guidance of approximately $10 million quarterly run rate on an annualized basis. This exceptional performance is testament to the dedication and hard work of our team as well as to our strong partnerships. This places our CDMO business at robust position and at an opportune space to pursue further expansion in the future. We are confident in our ability to capitalize on these market opportunities and are actively exploring options for further capacity expansion to meet the increasing demands.
I’ll now hand over the line to our CFO, Mr. Anish Ganatra to give you a brief on the financial performance of the company. Thank you very much.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Radhesh. Good evening to all the participants. I will share the highlights of our performance for FY ’23 and Q4 FY ’23, post which we’ll be happy to take questions. For FY ’23 on a consolidated basis, the company reported revenue from operations of INR2,077 crores as against INR1,453 crores in FY ’22, a growth of 43% year-on year. Operating EBITDA stood at INR550 crores as against INR355 crores in FY ’22, up by 55%. Operating EBITDA margin stood at 26.5% as against 24.4% in FY ’22, an increase of 207 basis points.
Operating PBT was up 51% at INR460 crores for FY ’23 as against INR305 crores in FY ’22. Operating PBT margin was at 22.2% in FY ’23 as against 21% in FY ’22, a jump of 116 basis points year-on year. Profit after-tax stood at INR375 crores for FY ’23 as against INR263 crores in FY ’22, a growth of 43% year-on year. PAT margin was at 18.1% for FY ’23 and remain constant against FY ’22.
Now coming to the quarter performance for Q4 FY ’23. Company reported growth of 70% in net revenue from operations to INR697 crores against INR409 crores in Q4 FY ’22. Operating EBITDA grew by about 114% year-on-year to INR202 crores as against INR94 crores in Q4 FY ’22. EBITDA margins stood at 28.9% for Q4 FY ’23, an increase of 586 basis points. Operating PBT stood at INR180 crores, growth of 120% as compared to the same period last year. PAT stood at INR136 crores for Q4 FY ’23 as against INR75 crores in Q4 FY ’22 with a growth of 81%.
Before we start with the question-and-answers, I would like to refer to a couple of items in the financials of this quarter and year-end. During the year, the company initiated an exercise to assess the estimated useful life of assets, plant and machinery and buildings. With the help of external technical consultants, we exercised covered assets at Dahej, our greenfield development, which started commercial operations during the year and at Dewas, the CDMO assets. Consequently, the depreciation charge for the quarter and year-end, 31st March 2023 is lower by approximately INR20.4 crores on a consolidated basis. In NFASL, the impact is about INR15.1 crore and in NFIL it is INR5.3 crores.
ESOP charges for the quarter stood at INR9.31 crores and INR16.79 crores for the full-year FY ’23. Consolidated net cash flow from operations at negative INR63.6 crore, primarily reflects initial working capital outlay, following the start-up of commercial operations at Dahej. No further infusion of working capital is expected during FY ’24, rather actions are in play to secure reduction of net working capital.
So, that is from my side. We will now open the floor for question-and-answers. Thank you very much.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Sudarshan Padmanabhan from JM Financial BMS. Please go ahead.
Sudarshan Padmanabhan — JM Financial Services Ltd. — Analyst
Yeah, thank you for taking my questions and congrats on great set of numbers. Sir, my question is, if I look at the specialty chemicals, you have done fantastically well and if I look at the last a few commentary from some of our peers, it seems to be a little mixed, specifically on the agrochemicals side. I mean, some of them talking about higher inventory and prices coming down. Just wanted your thoughts on this given that we have done extremely well hereto and what do we expect going forward.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, thank you very much for that question. I hope you’re able to hear me properly. So, we are really not seeing any impact on the pricing because as you know, these are all contracted. Most of it is contracted business and we primarily worked with the innovators on the new molecules, molecules which are just about to be launched or have just recently been launched. We don’t really have much business on the generic side. Your commentary or your question is very relevant for the generic molecules, not so much on the innovator side.
Having said that, we have seen some impact. And we expect that for the rest of the year, that is calendar year ’23, we will see some impact on one of the molecules, but that’s not really that significant in our specialty business. And if you look at on a calendar year ’23 basis, the maximum impact was probably in the quarter, which just got over, which is Q4 FY ’23, that impact will actually keep reducing as we move along. But we have been able to develop new opportunities to compensate for the volume that we lost in the last quarter and that will continue to happen. So overall, we really don’t see a significant impact on the inventory in the specialty business side, because our business is not so much on the generic side.
Sudarshan Padmanabhan — JM Financial Services Ltd. — Analyst
Sure, sir. And sir, in the specialty side, I mean, what would be the mix of pharma, agri, and non-pharma, non-agri at this point? Has there been any major change say in the fourth quarter versus what we have done in the past?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, the guidance that I gave last quarter continues to remain the same. Our specialty business, it’s actually tilting lot more on the agrochemical side. And as you know within the specialty chemicals, the pharma business was primarily supplying to the Indian generic pharma companies and we have consciously taken a decision to reduce that particular business. So, that quarter-on-quarter actually keeps reducing and our industrial business and our agrochemical business keeps increasing.
Sudarshan Padmanabhan — JM Financial Services Ltd. — Analyst
Sure, sir. The second question from my side is on the HPP side. I mean, specifically on the HFOs and the Honeywell contract. Given that over a period of time, I mean, you are going to see the new, the newer gases, which are much better from an environment perspective, I mean, it’s heartening to know that we have achieved a fair amount of scale here in a short span of time. Number 1, is there option of scalability, say assuming that the third quarter or the fourth quarter, the coming year? And is there a possibility of more such molecules getting into the pipeline, I mean from the Honeywell contract or anybody else?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No. So, our commentary on this remain same. As we had mentioned, our first priority would be to ensure that we stabilize this plant, achieve optimal capacity and which is what we are currently doing. We’ll continue to do that in the calendar year ’23. Priority number 2 would be to be the debottlenecking that I had mentioned to you. So, we are actually working on that. So, that will actually give us additional capacity of at least 20% immediately. That is from the next financial year onwards. And as we speak, we have actually identified a few newer molecules to work with Honeywell on and that’s basically at a very initial stage, that would be our Phase 3, or priority number 3.
Sudarshan Padmanabhan — JM Financial Services Ltd. — Analyst
Sure, sir. And one question before I join back the queue is on the CDMO part. I mean, we have achieved one of the highest sales, we have done till now. I mean, this sales is driven by newer molecules coming into the fold or scale-up of existing molecules, some of them hitting the commercial, what is the outlook over here, sir? I mean, I’m not looking at quarter-on-quarter but even at some year, I’m if I’m assuming say next couple of years, what is the kind of outlook that you are seeing here?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
So, I think on the CDMO side, we’ve actually getting very good traction with our key accounts. So, there, a, our existing molecules, molecules that we had been working on for the past few years have been scaling very well. Second, we’re actually getting lot of new opportunities with these key accounts and I’m happy to tell you that some of these opportunities are now even outside of fluorination because these key accounts are actually started trusting us for manufacturing and delivering products, which even outside are core value proposition. So, it’s primarily driven by these key account relationships and there is it’s repeat business and the new opportunities and new opportunities include fluorinated intermediate as well as non-fluorinated intermediate.
Having said that, we’ve actually continued to bring onboard and qualify new customers, but the contribution to the overall sales of this new customers is relatively on a lower side because as you can imagine when the relationship starts it typically starts at a very low — on a very low volume. But we believe that these relationships will then help us scale up opportunities over a period of time with these customers. So overall, if I because the pipeline from all these perspectives gives us lot of confidence now to start working on the cGMP 4, which is going to be a significantly larger plant then 1, 2, or 3.
Sudarshan Padmanabhan — JM Financial Services Ltd. — Analyst
Sure, sire. Thanks a lot, sir. I’ll join back the queue.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Abhijit Akella from Kotak Securities. Please go ahead.
Abhijit Akella — Kotak Securities — Analyst
Yeah, good evening and thank you so much for taking my questions. First question is actually on two, three financial aspects of the results. So one is, with regard to the depreciation amount. If there is any indication you could give us on what the normalized depreciation and amortization number should be going forward now that we’ve sort of taken a fresh look at the useful life of these assets. Second was just with regard to the sharp increase in other expenses, are there any one-off items there or is this a good run rate to work with going forward. And the third one was with regards to the tax rate, which seems to be a little bit on the higher side given that NFASL should be on a concessional on tax rate? So, if you could please just elaborate a bit on these three aspects.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
All right, okay. Abhijit, thanks for the question. So, on your first question regarding the normalized depreciation, this is kind of so you’re looking for an annualized number, I suppose. I mean, if I was to give you a guidance, it would be in the range of INR80 crores to INR90 crores, but that would be be sort of based on the current capitalization that we have, yeah. So, it’s what you see on the financials, those financials are effectively considering the depreciation based on when the assets have been put into use, but I guess, your question was more on the forward kind of what would be the annualized impact of the new rates were in play. Yeah?
Then the other expenses, I mean, if you compare last year to this year, in some sense, it is not a comparable number, because last year did not include NFASL. This being the first year of operationalization, right, and startup or commissioning, you are seeing the entire NFASL expenses coming in there. Now, some of the expenses that we have there are already focus area but those items are being worked, but frankly like I said, if you’re comparing between the two, it’s not the right comparison, just because it’s the first year of operation on the consolidated basis.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Can I just add to that?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Yes, please.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Abhijit, I would just like to add to that. On the other expenses in Q4, there were two charges there, which you will actually not see going forward. There was one consulting assignment that we had actually undertaken in Q4. So, that’s approximately about INR5 crore, which basically has been expensed in Q4 and not will not come in again. And there were some issues with respect to some of our OSBL in Dahej, because of which there was — there were two lines items, which actually came in Q4. That’s approximately around INR10 CR, which will not come in again. So, about INR15 crore I would say is an expense item, which actually came in Q4, which will not feature going forward.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
And Abhijit, your final question was on the tax rate. Now again, bear in mind that NFASL does not have a full year of operations. So, from a tax point of view, it would not really have a tax impact, most of the tax number that you see on the consolidated basis, is actually from the NFIL point of view, that’s why you see a higher number.
Abhijit Akella — Kotak Securities — Analyst
Okay, got it, that’s very helpful. Thank you. And the second question I had was, Radhesh, if you could talk a little bit about the growth outlook for the three business units for the upcoming year. And also specifically, just wanted to check number one, whether we should expect any impact on 1Q sales etc., because of the annual shutdown that you spoke about in HFO and I guess, specialty? And second with the R32 unit getting commissioned within a couple of quarters, and I guess the competition capacity also is coming up sometime fairly soon. So, how do you expect pricing in that segment to sort of perform in the near-term and maybe slightly medium-term as well, three- to five-year kind of outlook? Thank you so much.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yes, so as far as the outlook for FY ’24, currently we have no reason to believe of that there is any change in the overall guidance, qualitative guidance that we have given to you before on each of the three businesses. As I mentioned to you — as I mentioned earlier, the issue with respect to inventory, etc., on the agrochemical side has not been seen by us. To that extent it’s more happening on the generic side. There is some impact with respect to one product, but we have actually identified some other opportunities, etc., which will help compensate — more than compensate that down slide. So, we have not really have any reason to change the guidance — overall guidance that we have given for any of our three businesses.
Specifically, with respect to Q1, you’re absolutely right. On a sequential basis, you will actually see some drop, because our HPP plant in Dahej was shut for a month. This is a planned annual shutdown and what we did was to ensure that it aligns with our HF thing, we actually took the HF shutdown in Surat also. One of the lines was actually taken down for our plant annual shutdown during the same time. So, that was down for about three weeks and our Orchid plant was down for almost a month. So, the HF plant has already started and HPP plant will be starting very soon. So, because of which you will actually see slightly light Q1, but we expect that from Q2 onwards, again, the sales, etc., will again get to a normalized level.
And your third question was related to R32. See, if you actually look at our R32 capacity, it’s not that high, that we should actually be worried about the pricing, etc. Also, we already have lot of interest from our existing customers, some of the domestic existing customer as well as some of these partners in the international markets, who actually buy R32 from us on a long-term basis. So, we are trying to understand which of the customers we should probably tie-up with on a long-term basis, which of these we should work on as spot basis, etc. But as we move forward, we believe that the demand for R32 will continue to increase, not only as a single ingredient, but also as a part of a blend, I’m not only talking about HFC blend, but also HFC/HFO blend. Some of these conversations are already going on with some of our partners. So, if you ask me from, let’s say two to three-year perspective we believe that, that the pricing for R32 given the fact that our capacity is relatively limited, we believe that the pricing would remain strong.
Abhijit Akella — Kotak Securities — Analyst
Thank you so much, Radhesh, Anish. I’ll come back in the queue for any more. All the best.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Archit Joshi from B&K Securities. Please go ahead.
Archit Joshi — Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. — Analyst
Thanks for the opportunity, sir and congrats on a great set of numbers. Sir, my first question, a little curious about a comment made in the investor presentation about the new products that we have added in HCP. So, just wanted to check if this is in HFO, inorganic fluorides or [Indecipherable].
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, this is basically the commentary that you see in the investor presentation is the sale of the new product, that’s primarily we’re talking about the same molecule from Dahej, the Honeywell product.
Archit Joshi — Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. — Analyst
Okay, okay, got it, sir.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
There are some other new molecules that we have in the pipeline, but that has not really made any material impact to the numbers in Q4. The Q4 numbers are primarily because of the Honeywell product.
Archit Joshi — Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. — Analyst
Got it, sir. Got it. Sir, second question again on the HFC 32 bit, since competition also is I think as the previous participant mentioned, one of the reasons could it be that we haven’t had a near drop replacement to HFC 32 within the HFO series and a lot of global convergence that are happening from maybe 134a or in R125 are already kind of getting displaced into the HFO segment or the 4th gen ref gases. Would that be a fair assumption that HFC’s 32 demand will be fairly buoyant and it’s one of the reason why as to a lot of companies are adding capacity?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yes, so first of all, there are not many companies who are adding capacity. I mean, first of all, the only country where you can add capacity is India and that also beyond December you cannot do that. So, even if you see in India there are not many companies who are adding capacity because there’s a limited capacity addition, which has actually coming up. But in terms of demand, you’re absolutely right, 134a primarily actually goes into mobile air-conditioning. R32 primarily goes into stationary air-conditioning and there in India market as you know, the penetration is also increasing. And globally, there is a transition happening where we believe at least for quite a few years to go, there will be demand for R32 as a single ingredient as well as a part of a blend, initially as HFC-HFC blend and then as HFC-HFO blend. And as I mentioned to you, we’ve currently in discussion with our partners to develop those specific HFC-HFO’s blend wherein we will supply HFC to them for supply to the global market and we will actually look at supplying those blends in the Indian market.
Archit Joshi — Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. — Analyst
Understood, sir. So basically, sir, there are no new capacity additions even globally that are happening for R32 and so that is kind of a benefit to us. And sir just an addendum to the same thing. For the HFO business that we have currently it seems that the fourth quarter looks to be like a very strong quarter that you have reported in the subsidiaries performance and I just remembered from the plant visit takeaways that we have had we had kind of indicated that will most likely clock somewhere between INR505 crores, INR550 crores. And I can already see INR450 crores in FY ’23 financials from the subsidiary. Was there anything particularly exceptional about the fourth quarter that you were able to clock a significantly higher revenue? And going ahead, do things remain the same or they have slightly improved a bit?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, there was nothing exceptional per se about Q4. I think the only point I can make there is that we were able to achieve optimal capacity fairly quickly. Typically, what we were expecting to get in year two, we were able to achieve in year one itself. Having said that, in our current plan there is still capacity available. So, if you look at in Q4, we were not operating the plant to 100% capacity utilization. So, there is still capacity headroom available. In the quarters to come we believe that we should be able to get close to the full capacity utilization and then debottlenecking that I was talking about earlier will also start coming into play from the next year onwards.
Archit Joshi — Batlivala & Karani Securities India Pvt. Ltd. — Analyst
Got it, sir. Thanks. Thanks for this elaborate clarification and all the best. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Vivek Rajamani from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Vivek Rajamani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Hi, sir, thank you for the presentation and congratulations on a very strong result. Sir, last quarter you had mentioned that you will see further upside to your volumes as your new projects ramped-up to optimal levels and after that you should see better margins as you benefit from the operational efficiencies. Would it be fair to say that you started to see that in this quarter and that we should work with these margin levels to be sort of a new normal for you going forward?
And second question was more of a clarification from some of the earlier questions that came to you. Would it be possible to give some color with respect to the one molecule that you mentioned where you’re seeing some slowdown. What — how big is that in your overall portfolio? And secondly, beyond that molecule is there any area within the overall portfolio which you are monitoring closely from a risk perspective for F ’24 and F ’25? Thank you so much.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, so, I actually didn’t get your questions properly, but let me try to answer as much as I understood. The first question that you had on the margin, which specific molecule you were talking about?
Vivek Rajamani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
No, sir. It was more related to the specialty business. I think you were saying in the last quarter, you should — yeah.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, so as you know that the margins that we saw in Q4 is combination — is basically because of the performance that we saw across the three BUs, right and the right way to look at that if you look — you should look at our annualized margins. And as we have said before, these annualized margins are on annualized basis will keep improving as we add on this new capacities, new plants, etc. But it will be difficult for me to comment on a quarter-on-quarter basis, you know, if you ask me specifically to comment on Q4 and as we move forward if the margins will increase, etc., I think the right way to look at it, is look at the annualized margins.
On the second question. As I mentioned to you, there is this one particular molecule in specialty, which actually saw the impact in Q4. But we believe the maximum impact in the calendar year ’23 was actually seen in Q4. So going forward, actually that impact will actually start going down because we actually sold almost zero of that product in Q4. So, that impact already seen in the results. Going forward, we’ve actually already started seeing the demand coming back and it’s not — so whatever the significance of that molecule is you have already seen the impact of that in the last quarter.
Vivek Rajamani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Got it, sir. Really helpful. You did answer both my questions. Just one small clarification. Beyond this particular molecule, is there any other part of the portfolio that you’ve been monitoring with respect to any possible slowdown that may come through over the next couple of years or this is the only molecule where you’re seeing some risks? Thank you.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
It’s very difficult for us to really comment on it. We continue to engage with our customers. One of the molecules, which obviously is a lot of interest to us is the one that we supply to Honeywell because of two reasons, one, it goes into the housing market, it goes into multiple industries, but housing is one-off its end applications, and also because it has significant impact on our financial performance. Currently, the forecast that we have received from our customers basically tells us that H2 continues to be in line with what the earlier forecast, they have actually given to us. So, currently, we don’t have any reason to believe that is going to be significantly impacted in Q2, sorry in H2 of calendar year ’23, but we continue to closely monitor that.
Vivek Rajamani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Understood, sir. Thank you so much and all the very best.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Sanjesh Jain from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions, Radhesh and Anish. Few from my side. First, on the standalone business, if I see ex of the CDMO business it’s like declined by 20% Y-o-Y. Can you help us understand what all the business, erstwhile specialty, ref gas, inorganic? Which is the business causing a 20% decline in the revenue on the standalone basis, excluding NFASL? That’s my first question.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, I’m not able to understand. You are talking about Q4 or FY ’23?
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
No, I’m talking about Q4, in the standalone business, if you look at the revenue, excluding the CDMO business this again is included in the standalone revenue, if I take that off, there is a decline of 20% Y-o-Y in the underlying revenue. These are non-contracted or the erstwhile before these contracts that — I guess these are the revenue from those products lines. And it appears that that has declined by 20% Y-o-Y.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
I’m not able to see that, but we’ve just completed the Board meeting. So — but I think, let me try to answer that question. If you actually look at three businesses that we supply from NFIL, there is specialty, there is HPP and HPP is primarily inorganic and ref gas and the third is the CDMO piece. CDMO obviously has increased significantly on Y-o-Y basis but I think your question is primarily NFIL on a standalone minus CDMO, right?
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Correct, correct.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
So, on the inorganic and ref gas side, we are almost flat. It is — there is a slight increase there. On the specialty, you are right, there is a reduction, I don’t know exactly how much the reduction is, but it’s primarily because of two reasons. One, there is a molecule that we have actually taken to NFASL from NFIL. So, there is a small impact on that. The second impact, the second reason why you see that impact is because of that other molecule that I was talking to you about where we’ve actually seen that inventory issue and most of that was actually seen in Q4 which was actually supplied from Surat.
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Got it, got it. Because the number appears fairly big, it appears almost INR50 crores kind of because ref gas and inorganic gas not fallen [Indecipherable] close to INR60 crore impact.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah. I think, the right way of looking at that. If you look at the specialty business specifically, I think you should primarily look at NFIL and NFASL together. You should look at the specialty business on whole and I’ll tell you why. We, for lot of these molecules, especially that we are doing with the global agrochemical majors, we have now developed capability to do a lot of these molecules both of Surat as well as out of Dahej. And typically, depending on what new opportunities we get because as you know, the plant that we have in Dahej, is a slightly higher capacity, higher scale whereas the plant that we have in Surat are relatively smaller-scale. So, suppose if we get in a quarter an opportunity to do a new molecule, which we can do only out of Surat, not out of Dahej, because of the scale then we moved that molecule to Dahej and then we actually put this new molecule out of Surat.
Also, there is one molecule that we were earlier supplying on a continuous basis, out of Surat, in Q4, we had actually done downstream of that, so what has happened is that molecule has actually gone from Navin’s NFIL but in Surat to Dahej and we have done the downstream processing there and sold to the customer out of NFASL. But these kind of things are you know going to happen on a regular basis. The right way of looking at it would be to look at it on a consol basis on a business-to-business basis.
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Just a small clarification from a product moving from Surat to Dahej, I thought NFASL falls under the new tax regime of 15%. With this the new facility should have a new product for the eligibility of that. So, moving a product from Surat to Dahej, is it possible thing?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, yeah, absolutely. The product that we used to sell out of Surat, that’s the molecule we continue to sell. And that product is actually going to the other customers as well as to NFASL. Now, when we transfer it from NFIL to NFASL, it actually goes at a transfer pricing and then NFASL is not selling that molecule to the customer. There are four, five steps, additional steps that are actually done in NFASL and the molecule that we are supplying from NFASL are different one from the one that was supplied out of NFIL.
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Now, it’s very clear. Thanks. Thanks, Radhesh for that effort to make us understand. Second, on the CDMO side, phenomenal performance. Does this include $16 million contract revenue? Also, have we started supplying that? And for FY ’24, what should be the revenue guidance for the segment should we again achieve a 30% plus kind of growth from the debottlenecking, which unlocks another 25% capacity?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
What was the first question you asked Sanjesh?
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
So, we have announced a $16 million contract in the CDMO business in the Q3. We said that will start supplying from the April onwards. I just wanted to understand, have we started that? Is there any impact of that in this CDMO business of Q4? And a follow-up question is on the the revenue growth guidance for FY ’24 now that we have debottlenecked cGMP 3, which had close to 25% capacity. So 20% plus growth is doable in FY ’24, is that the right assumption?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, so that agreement that I talked to you about or that order that we had talked to you about we’ve actually supplied a significant part of that in Q4 and there is still balanced quantity, which we will be supplying in FY ’24. On the second question that you have, yes, we are extremely confident of our growth in FY ’24 and in the years to come. And we believe that — and which is what gives us the confidence to actually go for cGMP 4 because a lot of these molecules that we are actually currently working on, the projections that we have received from the customer look to be very positive and hence it’s necessary for us to have larger-scale plants to do higher warnings of those molecules. So, to your question specifically related to FY ’24, my answer would be yes.
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Got it. One last, sorry, for squeezing this on the margin. We have earlier said that we will gradually move towards 28% and 30%, but surprisingly that gradual was just a quarter. For the full year, do you think this kind of margin is sustainable, which is 29% and we improve on this.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, so as I mentioned earlier to another question, I think the way to look at it, if you look at the annualized margin, annualized basis what we delivered in FY ’23, and as I’ve mentioned before, because there are lot of things that happened in quarter-to-quarter, there are some new projects that we undertake, etc., etc., which could skew margins in a particular quarter either upwards or downwards. So, let us — I think the best way to look at it is you look at the annualized margin off FY ’23 and you will actually see that the margin has actually improved over FY ’22 and that is the overall trajectory that we will continue to see on an annualized basis.
Sanjesh Jain — ICICI Securities — Analyst
Clear, clear and thanks for answering all the questions and best of luck for the future quarters. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Rohit Nagraj from Centrum Broking. Please go ahead.
Rohit Nagraj — Centrum Broking — Analyst
Yeah, thanks for the opportunity and congrats. Sir, on the HF capacity, so last-time we had indicated that we’ll be doubling the capacity and debottlenecking is going on. So, effectively our capacity after two years will get doubled. So, are we currently sufficient for the next two years and based on the new capacity that we are planning, how much time we are expecting that this new 40,000 tonnes capacity will be utilized or after two years once it gets commissioned? Thank you.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah. So, first of all as far as the capacity is concerned, we have announced 40,000 metric tonne new plant that we are setting up. It’s going to take us about 24 months to get that plant ready and with that coming in, our capacity would be — we are actually significantly — will have significantly more than twice the capacity that we have today. And to your question, will we be deficit. We will have adequate capacity of HF for our own requirement. We probably will not have enough HF, to be able to sell in the merchant market. We are actually seeing lot more opportunities to sell in the merchant market and we would have got those opportunities if we had more HF available, but for our own consumption we have enough HF.
And we believe that we’ve continuously working on lot of these other projects. There are some projects which will get commissioned later this year. There are some other opportunities we are working on in our existing three BUs as well as some of the newer opportunities, lot of them are actually going to need HF. So, this 40,000 metric tonne capacity that we’re adding, it’s mainly driven by our own requirement of HF versus selling it into the merchant market. So, we believe that at least half of the capacity we should be able to use fairly quickly as soon as that plant is ready and then over a period of time initially, the rest of it, we will be selling in the merchant market, but we believe that in the next, the following three to four years even that capacity would actually get utilized by us for the downstream opportunities.
Rohit Nagraj — Centrum Broking — Analyst
Yeah, that’s fairly clear. Just one clarification on this, in terms of the of fluorspar sourcing, have we gotten into any arrangement with the any of those suppliers?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yes.
Rohit Nagraj — Centrum Broking — Analyst
Sure, that’s helpful. Then question is on the ESOP [ charge]. So, after FY ’23 ESOP charge during the year, how much of it is left and will come in FY 24 and if any for FY ’25? Thank you.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
So, Rohit, thanks for the question. I mean you know how the ESOP works, right. I mean, essentially, you’re doing a Black-Scholes model and then taking the cost into the books. Right. And the ESOP, the way it was structured was for over a four-year period. So, you will essentially see that the first two years of that, the charges will go up. And then the third and the fourth fourth year, the charges obviously come down, because what happens is, in year one, you get the charge for the kind of the first year and the second, and then the second, again you get for second, third and fourth. So, each progressive year the charge comes down. So, if you had to sort of ask me, what charge should we expect for the full year. I mean, you should probably take 16.79% was for half year, I would take about 31% for the FY ’24 and then it will progressively come down significantly.
Rohit Nagraj — Centrum Broking — Analyst
Sure, this is very helpful. Thanks and best of luck, sir.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Krishan Parwani from JM Financial. Please go ahead.
Krishan Parwani — JM Financial — Analyst
Yeah, hi Radhesh, congrats on a good set of numbers. Thanks for taking my question. So, I have like two, the first is on the molecule that you said you know, there was almost zero volume in the fourth quarter. So, is it — I mean, is it — is this product the one that where we faced the competition from the domestic player?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, no, no. This is got nothing to do with the domestic — nothing to do with domestic competition. This is basically because the same issue that we are actually seeing everywhere, there was some inventory build-up at the customer’s end. The demand for this molecule continues to remain extremely strong. This is actually a blockbuster molecule. And as we speak, we are actually looking at opportunities to not only expand the capacity in this particular molecule, but also do the downstream AI for this particular molecule. So, the overall demand outlook for this molecule continues to be extremely robust. It’s a blockbuster molecule and is expected to remain blockbuster for at least quite a few years. It’s just that there was significant inventory build-up in the pipeline. So, it is just a question of destocking and restocking. That’s about it. And most of that impact, we believe, is behind us now because lot of that was actually done in the Q1 calendar year, which is Q4 FY ’23.
Krishan Parwani — JM Financial — Analyst
Understood, Radhesh. So, the second one is on the CDMO front. Given we have seen a sharp jump as you already highlighted that some part of the PO is already factored in, in 4Q. So on a full-year basis more like probably 25%, 30% kind of a growth run rate that — is fair, or how do we see it?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No. So, I think as we have indicated earlier, you should basically take the annualized number of FY ’23 annualized number and you should be able to see a 20% plus growth on that number. But take annualized for FY ’23, because unfortunately, and it basically us impacts us on a positive as well negative side is that this business tends to be lumpy. Right. I mean, you saw that in Q1 and Q2. We — our performance was little softer and in H2 and I’ve indicated this right at the beginning of the financial year that we feel — we believe that H1 will be softer and H2 will be stronger, which is exactly what has happened. So, if you look at the numbers on an annualized basis, we should be able to show a growth of 20% plus in FY ’24.
Krishan Parwani — JM Financial — Analyst
Understood. And if I can squeeze the last small clarification. So, on the R&D front, are we like looking at products like I mean derivatives of Triflic acid or Triflic nitrates or something like that or where are we? Where are out R&D focus in terms of that?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No. So, we actually just invested significant amount in our R&D for not only expansion, but a significant upgradation in our R&D setup in Surat. Now, I will not be able to comment on the specific molecules if it’s a typically, these molecules or these opportunities typically get developed in our engagement with the customers, but our focus continues to be in identification and development of new technology platforms. Platforms, which typically the customers are not able to get from other organizations either in India or outside of India. So, our focus is on identification and development of new technology platforms and once we have those platforms than those platforms can be used to develop number of molecules based on those platform. So, that is how we typically approach the R&D emphasize.
Krishan Parwani — JM Financial — Analyst
Fair enough, Radhesh. Thank you for patiently answering my questions. All the best.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Bhaskar Chakraborty from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Bhaskar Chakraborty — Jefferies — Analyst
Thank you, Mr. Welling. Just wanted to understand what all items apart from HPP are contributing to the difference in revenues between the consolidated line and the standalone line?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No. Very simply, Dahej is under NFASL and Surat and Dewas are under NFIL. But as I mentioned earlier, I would just like to repeat that again. I think the right way to look at our business would be to look at on a consolidated basis.
Bhaskar Chakraborty — Jefferies — Analyst
So basically, the new agrochem dedicated plants that has come up where you have achieved optimum utilization, where does that figure in these numbers?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, that’s not in HPP, that’s in specialty and that’s in Dahej.
Bhaskar Chakraborty — Jefferies — Analyst
Understood. Thank you very much, sir.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Keyur from ICICI Prudential Life Insurance. Please go ahead.
Keyur Pandya — ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited — Analyst
First of all, congratulations to the team for great results. Sir, first question is on the HPP, so Honeywell product, in the past conference call you have mentioned that there may be possibly some slowdown depending on how the demand is in the western markets. So, just your thoughts on how you see HPP Honeywell product ramping-up the trajectory of growth and optimum utilization before you go for say debottlenecking? That is first question.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, I think I already have talked about this in — while answering some of the earlier questions. As I said, we continue to engage with Honeywell to understand how the demand outlook looks for the rest of the year. Currently, our expectation is that if you, as I mentioned to you in Q4 also we were not running the plant to full capacity, there is headroom available. And we believe that for the rest of the year, that is the rest of the calendar year we’ll probably run to the similar kind of capacity. I know, and while we do that, we will also work on this debottlenecking project. So, that that particular capacity comes on-stream before and of the current financial year.
Keyur Pandya — ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited — Analyst
Okay, understood. Sir, second question is on this two new plants commissioned. Firstly, dedicated and secondly is MPP. So, just clarification, dedicated is now on quarterly basis. This was fully utilized? And the MPP, so we have — as of now commercialized totaled three products of total five planned. So, how will the journey from here on say, commercialization of fourth and fifth molecule? So, when will we see optimum utilization?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
No, there is another molecule as I mentioned to you earlier, we had actually — you’re talking specifically related to MPP, right?
Keyur Pandya — ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited — Analyst
Correct.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah, so earlier if you remember we had actually talked about five molecules in MPP, four of them were agro, one was pharma. We actually had said that pharma is something that we will look at later on. Out of those four, we produced three in Q4 not to the full capacity, but we produced three and supplied these molecules to the customer. We will continue to produce these three and lot of these are campaign, etc., so they’re not going to be — the volumes are not going to be constant quarter-on-quarter. The fourth molecule we have actually — we will be starting later this year. And what we have also have done is we’ve actually identified another opportunity for another molecule to be supplied to another global agrochemical company and we’ve actually undertaking a very small capex to modify our MPP to actually put that molecule. So, that will be a completely new molecule, which we will be doing in the second half of the year. So, three we have already done, fourth, we will be doing in the coming year. There is another completely new, which we had not indicated earlier, we will be doing in the second half of the current financial year. And the final one, pharma, we currently don’t have any immediate plan of doing an MPP.
Keyur Pandya — ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited — Analyst
Okay, the clarification that dedicated has seen the full utilization for this quarter on a quarterly basis. Correct?
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yes, almost. There is some little headroom available. But yes, it’s a fairly optimized capacity utilization.
Keyur Pandya — ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited — Analyst
Okay. Sir, thanks a lot and all the very best. Thank you.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Bhavesh Jain from ENAM AMC. Please go ahead.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Sir, just want to ask about this working capital. I missed your comment. So, that have gone up. Anything specific?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Sorry, your voice is very soft, Bhavesh. Can you please…
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Sir, on working capital, that seems to have gone up in this year-end. So, anything specific or we have done planning for this maintenance shutdown?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
No, no, no Bhavesh. I mean, see the working capital, if you look at this is the first year of NFASL operations, right. So, you will see a big jump in working capital as the plants get into operations and we engage with customers for selling products as well as having inventories. So, it’s got nothing to do with shutdown.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
So that will normalize by second or third year of the operation? How do we see that or how should we build in?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
So, Bhavesh, see there is a lot of actions we are already taking in play to look at the working capital. Now that doesn’t mean that’s kind of ongoing business in some sense because you know, obviously as new assets come up, the working capital starts kind of going up. But then you kind of have actions around focusing on each component of working capital to bring it down. We are also looking at several vendor financing, supply chain financing programs, so that we can optimize the working capital further. All I can say actually is that at this level, we are not looking to increase the working capital, so it will remain at this or go lower actually. That’s what you should expect to see and the benefits won’t come as a kind of switch on-off, but they will be progressively seen over the year.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Okay. And sir, lastly on the capex side, what should we build-in for FY ’24 and ’25?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
For FY ’24 and ’25, I mean, we’ve already — so there’s already nectar in the pipeline as you are — sorry.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
So, I think there are two capexes that we have already announced. One is the agrochemical capex. And then there is the AHF capex. So, those are the two big capexes that we have announced. As you know, there is and there are some minor capexes that are going in Dewas, in Surat as well as in Dahej. Apart from that, we will be able to let you know about any other capex as and when we get approval from the Board. But will primarily be some of the capexes that I indicated in my opening remarks.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Okay. And sir, lastly, any interest cost we are capitalizing?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
So, on pre-operative basis it does get. So, we follow the accounting standard in that regard.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Okay, but Q4, majority of the finance cost will cover that. Right?
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
No, once the plants are operational you can’t capitalize it.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
Okay, okay, thanks a lot, sir. Thank you.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you.
Bhavesh Jain — Enam Securities Private Limited — Analyst
All the best, yeah.
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, due to time constraint that was our last question. I now hand the conference over to the management for the closing comments.
Radhesh R. Welling — Managing Director
Yeah. I would like to thank everyone for taking time out on Saturday evening and joining on the call. I hope we have been able to respond to your queries adequately. If you have any further queries you may reach out to our Investor Relation partner Orient Capital. Thank you very much and have a great weekend. Thank you.
Anish Ganatra — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]